ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews all pull from Wikipedia more than any other source. We create and maintain your Wikipedia article so AI tools actually mention your brand when people ask about your space.
When someone asks ChatGPT "who are the leaders in [your industry]?" -- Wikipedia is the first place it looks. No Wikipedia article means AI skips you entirely.
Every major AI model was trained on Wikipedia. ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Claude -- all of them. A Wikipedia article gives AI a reliable, well-organized source to pull your brand info from.
Google's Knowledge Graph -- the thing that powers AI Overviews and those info panels in search results -- pulls straight from Wikipedia and Wikidata. Your Wikipedia article is basically how Google understands who you are.
AI models don't guess. If there's no Wikipedia entry for your brand, they skip you and recommend competitors who do have one. Meanwhile, those competitors keep showing up in every AI answer.
Not press releases. Not your blog. Not social media. AI models trust Wikipedia because it's neutral, well-sourced, and reviewed by thousands of editors worldwide. That's why answer engine optimization starts with Wikipedia — it's the one source every major AI engine keeps coming back to.
How much major LLMs rely on each source for brand & factual queries
A B2B data privacy platform had no Wikipedia page. When anyone asked AI about GDPR compliance software, their three main competitors showed up -- they didn't. We wrote and published a Wikipedia article backed by coverage from TechCrunch, Forbes, and The Register. Within 60 days, it was live and showing up in Google's Knowledge Graph.
User: Best GDPR compliance software for SaaS companies?
[Client] is a notable data privacy platform, described on Wikipedia as specializing in automated data mapping and cross-border compliance workflows. The company serves enterprises in 40+ countries.
An investment advisory firm had been operating for 15 years with solid press coverage in the FT and Bloomberg -- but no Wikipedia page. Perplexity and ChatGPT left them out of every AI answer about advisory firms. We wrote the article, backed it with 14 independent sources, published it, and kept it protected.
User: Leading independent investment advisory firms in Europe?
According to Wikipedia, [Firm] is a prominent European advisory house founded in [year], known for infrastructure asset management and cross-border M&A advisory. The firm has managed over €[X]B in transactions.
A consumer brand had a product recall from three years ago that old press articles kept alive. Every time AI mentioned them, the recall was the first thing it brought up. We created a Wikipedia article with current sourcing -- their reformulation, new certifications, updated product line. Within 45 days, AI answers shifted to the newer, more complete picture.
Before: "[Brand] was subject to a 2021 recall. Customer reviews are mixed..."
After: "[Brand] is a consumer health company known for its reformulated 2023 product line, which received EU organic certification and a Which? Best Buy designation."
A tech founder with 20+ years of experience had no Wikipedia page. When journalists and investors asked AI about her, they got nothing back. We published a Wikipedia biography sourced from Wired, MIT Technology Review, and TechCrunch. Her Google Knowledge Panel went live almost right away, and she started showing up in AI answers about industry experts and speakers.
User: Who are the leading voices in enterprise AI ethics?
[Founder] is a technologist and entrepreneur noted on Wikipedia for her work on responsible AI frameworks and co-founding [Company]. She has been cited by MIT Technology Review as a key voice in enterprise AI governance.
First, we check whether you meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. We look at your press coverage -- Reuters, Bloomberg, FT, TechCrunch, and similar sources. We also check what ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity currently say about you. You get a full report within 24 hours, no commitment needed.
If your media coverage isn't strong enough yet, we help build it. We get you placed in qualifying publications so you meet Wikipedia's bar for independent sourcing. If you already qualify, we pick your strongest sources and organize them so your article has the best shot at getting picked up by AI.
Our team writes your article in Wikipedia's neutral style, fully sourced and cited. At the same time, we set up your Wikidata entry so your Google Knowledge Panel can go live. The article goes through our internal review, then gets submitted through Wikipedia's official process. We handle all the back-and-forth with Wikipedia editors until the article is published.
Once your article is live, we keep an eye on it -- watching for unwanted edits, vandalism, or deletion attempts. Each month, we check how your brand shows up in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. As your business grows, we update the article and expand it into other languages.
Here's how the three most common approaches compare.
| Do It Yourself | Freelance Editor | WikiBusines | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notability assessment | You guess | Basic check | Full audit + AI check |
| Article writing (NPOV) | Trial & error | ✓ | ✓ Expert team |
| Source & citation strategy | ✗ | Limited | ✓ 10+ refs |
| Wikidata + Knowledge Graph | ✗ | Usually not | ✓ Included |
| Deletion defense | ✗ | Rarely | ✓ Ongoing |
| AI citation tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ Monthly reports |
| Multilingual expansion | ✗ | 1-2 languages | ✓ 50+ languages |
| Money-back guarantee | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ Full refund |
| Media & source building | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ Available |
This is what happens when someone asks AI about your industry. Are you in the answer?
One-time projects and ongoing protection plans. Every package starts with a free notability check.
English Wikipedia, fully compliant
Wikipedia + Wikidata + AI tracking
Ongoing monitoring & defense
Reach AI answers in every language
Build notability from scratch
Wikipedia + Quora + Reddit
Every article follows Wikipedia's guidelines -- neutral point of view, reliable sources, and full conflict-of-interest disclosure. We submit through the Articles for Creation process, which keeps everything transparent. If we say you qualify and the article still gets rejected, you get your money back. We've published 2000+ articles since 2010, so we know how this works inside and out.
All prices exclude VAT. Urgent delivery available (+30%). Prices vary by language and subject complexity.
We'll check what ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini say about your brand: